Galvan v. Barnett

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 13520 · 1942-03-25 · Published · 50 Cal. App. 2d 856 · 124 P.2d 81

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

50 Cal.App.2d 856 (1942) BENITO MACIOS GALVAN et al., Appellants, v. EDWIN W. BARNETT et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 13520. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 25, 1942. Samuel Mirman and Samuel Rubenstein for Appellants.

Frank Karr, E. E. Morris, C. W. Cornell, O. O. Collins and Randolph Karr for Respondents.

Memorandum THE COURT.

The respondents having filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by said certificate and by the authorities cited.

It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it is, hereby dismissed. *857