United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50213 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-CR-03890-WQH-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego PALOMON SANCHEZ-LARA, ORDER AMENDING Defendant - Appellant. MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC Before: D.W. NELSON, BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on April 20, 2011, is amended as follows:
Page 3, lines 8-9, remove “, for which he ultimately served 293 days in jail”
With the amendment to Memorandum Disposition, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Bybee and Judge M. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.
App. P. 35.)
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED and no further petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc will be entertained.