gno.law

People v. Higgins

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 2923 · 1937-02-03 · Published · 19 Cal. App. 2d 744

Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

19 Cal.App.2d 744 (1937) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CHARLES HIGGINS et al., Appellants.

Crim. No. 2923. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

February 3, 1937. Gladys Towles Root, David B. Larimer, Frederic H. Vercoe, Public Defender, and William B. Neeley, Deputy Public Defender, for Appellants.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and R. S. McLaughlin, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Memorandum The Court.

[1] There remain for decision in this case the appeals of the defendants from the order of the trial court denying the defendants' motions for a new trial. For the reasons stated in our opinion of January 20, 1937, People v. Higgins, 18 Cal.App.2d 595 [64 PaCal.2d 454], this order is also reversed.

Order reversed.

Cites, in this corpus