gno.law

Taliaferro v. Crola

California Court of Appeal · Civ. 20504 · 1963-06-11 · Published · 217 Cal. App. 2d 103 · 31 Cal. Rptr. 442 · 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1877

EUGENE A. TALIAFERRO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MARIE JANE CROLA Et Al., Defendants and Respondents

Proceeding
appeal from an order
Trial court
Superior Court of Contra Costa County
Trial judge
Vernon Stoll
Outcome
dismissed — [fn*] Dismissed.
Area
civil
Panel
Byrl R. Salsman (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Salsman

SALSMAN, J.

On June 20, 1960 the trial court entered judgment in favor of respondents. The record before us does not disclose any motion for a new trial. On August 17, 1961, appellant filed a motion to vacate the judgment, and this motion was denied by minute order on August 28, 1961. The appeal now before us is from the minute order by which the trial court refused to vacate its judgment.

It is apparent from the brief statement just made that appellant seeks to appeal from a nonappealable order, because the minute order refusing to vacate the judgment is, under the facts here present, a nonappealable order.

(Arthur v. City of Los Angeles, 144 Cal.App.2d 545, 546 [301 P.2d 286] ;

Sharpe v. Sharpe, 55 Cal.App.2d 262, 265 [130 P.2d 462]; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 491; 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 26, p. 2170.) Ap *104 pellant had the right to appeal from the judgment but did not do so within the time limited by law, and he cannot extend his time to appeal by the simple expedient of a motion to vacate the judgment, made at his own convenience, and later appeal from the order denying his motion. (See Estate of Baker, 170 Cal. 578, 581-582 [150 P. 989].)

Where, as here, the appellate court is presented with an appeal from a nonappealable order, it is the duty of the court to dismiss the appeal.

(Collins v. Corse, 8 Cal.2d 123, 124 [64 P.2d 137];

Wilson v. Wilson, 96 Cal.App.2d 589, 596, 597 [216 P.2d 104].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Draper, P. J., and Devine, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by