gno.law

McMillin v. Ventura Savings & Loan Ass'n

California Court of Appeal · Civ. 37029 · 1971-02-24 · Published · 15 Cal. App. 3d 588 · 93 Cal. Rptr. 359 · 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 925

VELMA K. McMILLIN Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. VENTURA SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION Et Al., Defendants and Respondents

Area
civil
Panel
James A. Cobey (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Cobey

Opinion COBEY, Acting P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal of the second cause of action of the second amended complaint made and entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 581, subdivision 3 and 581d. The dismissal was made by the court on motion of two of the defendants after their general demurrer to this cause of action against them alone had been sustained with leave to amend and plaintiffs had failed to amend their complaint within the time allowed by the court. There remained pending against these demurring defendants, however, and against another defendant as well the first cause of action of the second amended complaint. There also remained pending against the third defendant alone the third cause of action.

This appeal must be dismissed because it has been taken from a nonappealable interlocutory judgment and not from a final judgment. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 904, 904.1, subd. (a);

Mather v. Mather, 5 Cal.2d 617, 618 [55 P.2d 74];

Gombos v. Ashe, 158 Cal.App.2d 517, 520-523 [322 P.2d 933];

Daniels v. Daniels, 136 Cal.App.2d 224, 227 [288 P.2d 910];

Johnson v. Master Fan Corp., 181 Cal.App.2d 569, 570, 572 [5 Cal.Rptr. 187].) The judgment under appeal disposed of but one cause of action in a complaint containing three causes of action.

The appeal is dismissed.

Schweitzer, J., and Allport, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by