United States v. Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Gordon Thompson (district judge)
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50135 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:05-cr-00538-GT-1 v. MEMORANDUM * MOISES RAMIREZ-ACOLTZI, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gordon Thompson, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted December 14, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon his revocation.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ramirez-Acolotzi contends that the supervised release revocation procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Ramirez-Acoltzi concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir. 2008), and he raises it only to preserve the issue for further review.
AFFIRMED.
2 10-50135
Cites, in this corpus
- United States v. Santana 07-50190 · 2008-05-27