Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez
Arthur Duane JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.P. GONZALEZ, Associate Warden; Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- M. James Lorenz (district judge)
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Atsushi W. Tashima (author), Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, No. 09-56157 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:05-cv-00513-L-NLS v. MEMORANDUM * J. P. GONZALEZ, Associate Warden; et al., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted November 16, 2010 Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Arthur Duane Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of access to courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm on any grounds supported by the record. Atel Fin. Corp. v. Quaker Coal Co., 321 F.3d 924, 926 (9th Cir. 2003) (per curiam). We review de novo, Midwaters Trawlers Coop. v. Dep’t of Commerce, 393 F.3d 994, 1002 (9th Cir.
2004), and we affirm.
The only issue open on remand was whether Jackson was unable to bring a claim in state court because defendants allegedly denied him access to some of his legal materials. Jackson has not raised this issue on appeal, and thus it is waived.
See McKay v. Ingleson, 558 F.3d 888, 981 n.5 (2009).
Jackson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
09-56157