gno.law

United States v. Eduardo Ayon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 10-50021 · 2010-09-02 · Unpublished

Proceeding
appeal
Trial court
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Trial judge
Roger T. Benitez (district judge)
Outcome
affirmed — AFFIRMED.
Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50021 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:06-cr-02162-BEN v. MEMORANDUM * EDUARDO AYON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 23, 2010 ** Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Ayon appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ayon contends that the district court failed to adequately explain its sentence. The district court’s explanation was sufficient and met the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). See United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th Cir. 2000).

Ayon also contends that the imposition of supervised release violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

2 10-50021

Cites, in this corpus