gno.law

People v. One 1938 Ford Sedan

California Court of Appeal · Civ. 17395 · 1950-07-07 · Published · 98 Cal. App. 2d 333 · 219 P.2d 839 · 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1851

The PEOPLE, Appellant, v. ONE 1938 FORD SEDAN, ENGINE NO. ID 66852GG, Respondent

Area
criminal
Panel
Clement L. Shinn (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Shinn

SHINN, P. J.

The question on this appeal is whether the trial court made a $199.88 mistake. The respondent, a bank, exercised good judgment in not filing a brief, inasmuch as it clearly appears from the record that the judgment is not in accordance with law.

The action is for the forfeiture of an automobile which was seized by the Division of Narcotic Enforcement while it was being knowingly used for the transportation of marijuana. The registered owner did not defend. The bank, holding a chattel mortgage upon which there was unpaid the sum of $199.88 answered, but failed to allege or prove at the trial facts which would have protected its lien, namely, that its mortgage interest was acquired after a reasonable investi *334 gation of the moral responsibility, character and reputation of the purchaser (mortgagor). (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11620, 11622.) The court found that the bank had made no such investigation, but nevertheless adjudged its lien to be valid and forfeited the title subject to the lien. The interest of the bank also should have been declared forfeited because of its failure to bring itself within the exception, stated in said code sections, under which the holder of a lien upon a vehicle which is subject to forfeiture may preserve his lien right.

(People v. One 1941 Buick Club Coupe, 72 Cal.App.2d 593 [165 P.2d 44].)

The judgment is reversed with instructions to enter another judgment forfeiting the title to said vehicle unconditionally.

Vallée, J., concurred.

Wood, J., being disqualified, did not participate herein.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by