gno.law

City of Long Beach v. Bozek

California Supreme Court · L.A. 31448 · 1983-04-25 · Published · 661 P.2d 1072 · 33 Cal. 3d 727 · 190 Cal. Rptr. 918 · 1983 Cal. LEXIS 175

CITY OF LONG BEACH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICHARD BOZEK, Defendant and Respondent

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Opinion THE COURT.

On lanuary 10, 1983, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in this case and ordered that “The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California to consider whether its judgment is based upon federal or state constitutional grounds, or both.” (— U.S. — [74 L.Ed.2d 943, 103 S.Ct. 712].)

Pursuant to this mandate, the remittitur is recalled. We have reexamined our decision in this case (reported at 31 Cal.3d 527 [183 Cal.Rptr. 86, 645 P.2d *728 137]), and certify that our judgment is based on both the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 3, of the California Constitution; accordingly, the latter provision furnishes an independent ground to support the decision. Because we deem it unnecessary to modify our prior opinion, we reiterate that opinion in its entirety.

Let the remittitur issue forthwith.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by