gno.law

In Re LeVan

California Court of Appeal · Crim. 4354 · 1949-07-18 · Published · 93 Cal. App. 2d 7 · 207 P.2d 1066 · 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1334

In Re GEORGE FRANCIS LeVAN, JR., a Minor. MART LeVAN, Appellant

Area
other
Panel
Marshall F. McComb (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, Acting P. J.

Appellant, who is the mother of George Francis LeVan, Jr., a minor * , appeals on the judgment roll alone from an order of the Juvenile Court of Los Angeles County made January 3, 1949, releasing the custody of the *8 minor to the probation officer for placement in the home of the minor’s father.

Appellant asks that this court reverse the judgment of the juvenile court. However, since the appeal is upon the judgment roll alone, we must assume that the proceedings taken in the lower court were regular in all respects (In re Pierce, 127 Cal.App. 773, 775 [16 P.2d 765]), and we are confined to an examination of the clerk’s transcript on appeal to determine whether there is any reversible error.

An examination of such record fails to disclose any error, but on the contrary, shows that each document and order was duly and regularly made and entered. Appellant has failed either by argument or citation of authority to direct the attention of this court to any error in the-proceedings leading to or in the order of placement from which the appeal is taken.

The order is affirmed.

Wilson, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied July 28, 1949, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 11,1949.

* It is to be noted that the mother had the right to appeal as an interested party. (Welf. & Inst. Code (1944), § 580;

In re Matter of Hill, 78 Cal.App. 23, 26 [247 P. 591].)

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by