gno.law

In Re Jensen

California Supreme Court · L.A. 31020 · 1978-11-24 · Published · 593 P.2d 200 · 24 Cal. 3d 72 · 154 Cal. Rptr. 503 · 1978 Cal. LEXIS 337

In Re Arden T. Jensen, a Judge of the Superior Court, on Censure.

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

*73 Opinion THE COURT.— The Commission on Judicial Performance, following a factual stipulation in lieu of hearing, receipt of documentaiy evidence in mitigation, and oral argument, found that despite an informal admonition by the commission, between 1971 and 1977 Judge Arden T. Jensen repeatedly failed to decide within 90 days cases that had been submitted to him for decision, and that he nevertheless regularly executed affidavits declaring that no cause remained pending and undetermined before him for 90 days after such submission, thus entitling him to his salary. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 19; Gov. Code, § 68210.)

The commission found that Judge Jensen’s failure to decide his cases on time was not caused by an intentional disregard of his duties, but that with proper application he could have decided each of the matters within 90 days of submission. The commission therefore concluded that Judge Jensen’s conduct constituted persistent failure to perform his duties (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c)), and recommended that he be publicly censured.

After reviewing the record we are satisfied that the conclusion of the commission is justified and that its recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, for the reasons stated Judge Jensen is hereby censured.

Cited by