— gno.law

District Court, S.D. California · 3:26-cv-02673 · 2026-08-27 · Unknown

Anthony Lawrence-Devonn Calhoun v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Proceeding: district
Area: civil
Panel: Robert Steven Huie (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T20:19Z · confidence high

The court reviewed the parties' joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. The court ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

What the court decided	The model
Dismissal of the action with prejudice based on the parties' joint stipulation. “The action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”	agree with court The court correctly applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, provided the action has not been served with a counterclaim or a motion for summary judgment. The court cited Wilson v. City of San Jose, which confirms that a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice is effective upon filing and satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The decision follows directly from the procedural rule and the parties' agreement.

What the court decided

The model

Dismissal of the action with prejudice based on the parties' joint stipulation.

“The action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

agree with court
The court correctly applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, provided the action has not been served with a counterclaim or a motion for summary judgment. The court cited Wilson v. City of San Jose, which confirms that a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice is effective upon filing and satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The decision follows directly from the procedural rule and the parties' agreement.

The order itself: sound — The order is procedurally correct and cites the appropriate Ninth Circuit authority for the proposition that a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice is effective upon filing under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The reasoning is sufficient for a procedural dismissal based on stipulation.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LAWRENCE-DEVONN Case No.: 26-cv-2673-RSH-DEB CALHOUN, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 [ECF No. 11] GENERAL DYNAMICS 15 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 | Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. ECF 2 |INo. 11. The stipulation satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and is effective 3 lon filing. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in 4 | its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 || Dated: August 26, 2026 fekut C Ue ? Hon. Robert S.Huie 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28