Linda Kanner, Trustee of the Ella Kanner Revocable Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Julian C. Baker; Stephen R. Biggar, M.D., PhD; Daniel B. Soland; Laura A. Brege; Stephen R. Davis; Elizabeth A. Garofalo, M.D.; James M. Daly; Edmund P. Harrigan, M.D.; and Srdjan (Serge) Stankovic
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William Q. Hayes (author)
Analysis
The court considered an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a derivative settlement in a shareholder derivative action against the officers and directors of Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. The court granted the motion, preliminarily approving the settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and setting a hearing for final approval.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Derivative Settlement granted“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Derivative Settlement (ECF No. 26) is granted as follows:” | agree with court The court applied the standard from Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Comm'n of City & County of San Francisco, requiring a preliminary determination that the settlement is not the product of fraud or overreaching and is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The order recites that the settlement was reached during arm's length, good faith negotiations via mediation, and that the court found it fair, reasonable, and adequate upon preliminary review. This follows the procedural requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1(c). |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the governing rule (Rule 23.1) and the applicable Ninth Circuit standard for preliminary approval (Officers for Justice). It recites the necessary factual predicate (mediation, arm's length negotiation) and makes the required preliminary finding of fairness and reasonableness. The procedural steps for notice and the final approval hearing are consistent with standard practice for derivative settlements.
How this analysis was made · dispute it
unusual dispositionOpinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA KANNER, Trustee of the Ella Case No. 3:23-cv-02293-WQH-MSB Kanner Revocable Trust, Derivatively on 12 Behalf of Nominal Defendant ACADIA ORDER 13 PHARMACEUTICALS INC., 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 JULIAN C. BAKER; STEPHEN R. BIGGAR, M.D., PHD; DANIEL B. 17 SOLAND; LAURA A. BREGE; 18 STEPHEN R. DAVIS; ELIZABETH A. GAROFALO, M.D.; JAMES M. DALY; 19 EDMUND P. HARRIGAN, M.D.; and 20 SRDJAN (SERGE) STANKOVIC, 21 Defendants. 22 HAYES, Judge: 23 On December 15, 2023, Plaintiff Ella Kanner, on behalf of nominal defendant 24 Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Acadia” or the “company”), initiated this shareholder 25 derivative action by filing a Complaint against Defendants Julian C. Baker, Stephen R. 26 Biggar, M.D., PhD; Daniel B. Soland; Laura A. Brege; Stephen R. Davis; Elizabeth A. 27 Garofalo, M.D.; James M. Daly; Edmund P. Harrigan, M.D.; and Srdjan (Serge) Stankovic 28 (“Defendants”) asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of 1 control, waste of corporate assets, insider trading, and violations of the Securities Exchange 2 Act of 1934. (ECF No. 1.)1 3 On April 15, 2026, Plaintiff and Defendants (together, the “parties”) filed a Joint 4 Status Report stating that, on December 11, 2025, they participated in a mediation session 5 and reached a settlement in principle. (ECF No. 21.) 6 On July 14, 2026, Plaintiff filed the pending Motion for Preliminary Approval of 7 Derivative Settlement. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff requests “that the Court enter an order 8 preliminarily approving the Settlement, including approving the dissemination of notice of 9 the Settlement and setting a date for the Settlement Hearing.” Id. at 2; see also Stipulation 10 and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation” or “Settlement”), ECF No. 26-3. On 11 August 5, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of the motion. (ECF No. 27.) The docket 12 reflects that no party has filed an opposition to the motion. 13 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 provides that a “derivative action may be 14 settled, voluntarily dismissed, or compromised only with the court’s approval.” Fed. R. 15 Civ. P. 23.1(c). Rule 23.1 also provides that “[n]otice of a proposed settlement . . . must be 16 given to shareholders or members in the manner that the court orders.” The Ninth Circuit 17 states that, upon preliminary review of a proposed settlement, a district court’s analysis 18 “must be limited to the extent necessary to reach a reasoned judgment that the agreement 19 is not the product of fraud or overreaching by, or collusion between, the negotiating parties, 20 and that the settlement, taken as a whole, is fair, reasonable and adequate to all concerned.” 21 Officers for Just. v. Civ. Serv. Comm’n of City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 688 F.2d 615, 22 625 (9th Cir. 1982). 23 Here, the parties reached the proposed Settlement during a mediation overseen by 24 Michelle Yoshida, Esq. of Phillips ADR Enterprises. (ECF No. 26-1 at 6.) In their motion, 25 the parties describe the terms of the Settlement, including heightened oversight of Acadia’s 26 27 1 On July 6, 2026, the Court issued an Order substituting Plaintiff Linda Kanner, Trustee of the Ella Kanner 28 1 disclosures regarding its drug trials, the creation of a “Chief Science Officer” position and 2 a Scientific Committee in the company, enhancements to the company’s Audit Committee, 3 amendments to its Insider Trading Policy, and the formal adoption of “Rule 10b5-1 Trading 4 Plan Guidelines.” Id. at 12–21. Upon preliminary review of the proposed Settlement and 5 the parties’ proposed method of providing notice of the Settlement to Acadia stockholders, 6 the Court finds that the proposed Settlement was reached during arm’s length, good faith 7 negotiations and that the agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of 9 Derivative Settlement (ECF No. 26) is granted as follows:2 10 1. The Court preliminarily approves, subject to further consideration at the 11 Settlement Hearing described below, the Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation as being 12 fair, reasonable, and adequate. 13 2. On Wednesday, January 13, 2027, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 15B at the 14 James M. Carter and Judith N. Keep United States Courthouse, 333 West Broadway, San 15 Diego, CA 92101 the Honorable William Q. Hayes will hold a hearing (the “Settlement 16 Hearing”) at which the Court will determine whether: (i) the terms of the Stipulation should 17 be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) the Notice, as set forth in Exhibit C to 18 the Stipulation, (ECF No. 26-3 at 52–68), fully satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 23.1 and the requirements of due process; (iii) to enter the proposed 20 Order and Final Judgment in its entirety, as set forth in Exhibit D to the Stipulation, (ECF 21 No. 26-3 at 71–73); (iv) the Fee and Expense Amount as well as the Service Awards should 22 be approved; and (v) to determine such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. 23 3. The Court reserves the right to: (i) approve the Settlement, with such 24 modifications as may be agreed to by counsel for the Parties consistent with such 25 Settlement, without further notice to Current Acadia Stockholders; (ii) continue or adjourn 26 27 2 Except as otherwise expressly provided below or as the context otherwise requires, all capitalized terms 28 1 the Settlement Hearing from time to time, by oral announcement at the hearing or at any 2 adjournment thereof, without further notice to Current Acadia Stockholders; and (iii) the 3 right to conduct the Settlement Hearing remotely without further notice to Current Acadia 4 Stockholders. 5 4. The Court finds that the form, substance, and dissemination of information to 6 Current Acadia Stockholders regarding the proposed Settlement in the manner set out in 7 this order (“Preliminary Approval Order”), including the Notice, as set forth in Exhibit C 8 to the Stipulation, (ECF No. 26-3 at 52–68), constitutes the best notice practicable under 9 the circumstances and complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and all other 10 applicable law and due process. 11 5. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of the filing of this Order, the notice of 12 the Settlement shall be provided through (i) the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K 13 with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) by the Company, which shall 14 include as attachments the approved settlement notice (“Settlement Notice”) and the 15 Stipulation and exhibits thereto; (ii) the publication on the internet of the Settlement Notice 16 one time in GlobeNewswire or similar newswire service; and (iii) the posting of the 17 Settlement Notice, Stipulation and exhibits thereto on the Company’s Investor Relations 18 website, to remain there through the date of the Settlement Hearing. 19 6. All costs incurred in the posting, filing, and publishing of the notice of the 20 Settlement as provided in paragraph 5 above shall be paid by Acadia, and Defendants shall 21 undertake all administrative responsibility for the posting, filing, and publishing of such 22 notice of the Settlement. 23 7. At least fourteen (14) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing, 24 Defendants’ Counsel shall file with the Court an appropriate affidavit with respect to the 25 posting, filing, and publishing of the notice of the Settlement as provided for in paragraph 26 5 of this Preliminary Approval Order. 27 8. Prior to Final Approval of the Settlement by the Court, Stockholders, Current 28 Acadia Stockholders, and any other of Stockholders’ Releasing Parties, and anyone who 1 acts or purports to act on their behalf, are barred and enjoined from filing, commencing, 2 prosecuting, intervening in, participating in, or receiving any benefits or other relief from 3 any other lawsuit, arbitration, or administrative, regulatory, or other proceeding (including 4 a motion or complaint in intervention in any such action or proceeding if the person or 5 entity filing such motion or complaint in intervention purports to be acting as, on behalf of, 6 for the benefit of, or derivatively for any of the above persons or entities) or order, in any 7 jurisdiction or forum, as to the Released Defendant Parties based on or relating in any way 8 to the Released Claims. 9 9. Current Acadia Stockholders who wish to object to the fairness, 10 reasonableness or adequacy of the Settlement or to any term(s) of the Settlement must both 11 serve on Stockholders’ Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel (as set out below) and file with 12 the Court a statement of objection, which must be received by no later than December 23, 13 2026. Any Current Acadia Stockholder may object on his, her or its own, or through 14 counsel hired at his, her or its own expense. Any Current Acadia Stockholder’s objection 15 should set out the specific reasons, if any, for each objection, including any legal support 16 the Current Acadia Stockholder wishes to bring to the Court’s attention and any evidence 17 the Current Acadia Stockholder wishes to introduce in support of such objections. The 18 statement of objection must include the caption of the Action and the following 19 information: (i) the Current Acadia Stockholder’s name, address, telephone number and e- 20 mail address (if available); (ii) the number of shares of Acadia stock the Current Acadia 21 Stockholder currently holds, together with third-party documentary evidence, such as the 22 most recent account statement, showing such share ownership, and proof of being a current 23 Acadia stockholder as of July 9, 2026, through the present, (iii) if the objection is made 24 through the Current Acadia Stockholder’s counsel, that counsel’s name, address, telephone 25 number and e-mail address; (iv) a statement of specific objections to the Settlement, the 26 grounds therefore, or the reasons for such person desiring to appear and be heard, as well 27 as all documents or writings such person desires the Court to consider; (v) the identities of 28 any witnesses such person plans on calling at the Settlement Hearing, along with a 1 summary description of their likely testimony; and (vi) a list – including dates, courts, case 2 names and numbers, and disposition – of any other settlements to which the individual or 3 entity has been a party to or objected during the previous three (3) years. 4 10. Any attorney retained by a Current Acadia Stockholder for the purpose of 5 objecting must both serve on Stockholders’ Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel (as set out 6 below) and file with the Court a notice of appearance, which must be received by no later 7 than December 23, 2026. 8 11. A Current Acadia Stockholder who wishes to object to the proposed 9 Settlement does not need to attend the Settlement Hearing. However, any Current Acadia 10 Stockholder who files and serves a timely written objection pursuant to this Preliminary 11 Approval Order may appear at the Settlement Hearing either in person or through personal 12 counsel retained at his, her or its own expense. Any Current Acadia Stockholder’s counsel 13 who intends to make an appearance at the Settlement Hearing must serve on Stockholders’ 14 Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel (as set out below) and file with the Court a notice of 15 intention to appear, which must be received by no later than December 23, 2026. 16 12. Any submissions made pursuant to paragraphs 9 through 11 of this 17 Preliminary Approval Order must be (i) sent or delivered to the following addresses: 18 19 a. The Court:
20 Clerk of Court 21 United States District Court Southern District of California 22 333 West Broadway, Suite 420 23 San Diego, CA 92101 24 b. Stockholders’ Counsel: 25 GAINEY McKENNA & EGLESTON 26 Thomas J. McKenna 27 260 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10016 28 1 Email: tjmckenna@gme-law.com 2 KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 3 Melinda A. Nicholson 1100 Poydras Street, Suite 960 4 New Orleans, Louisiana 70163 5 Tel: (504) 648-1842 Email: melinda.nicholson@ksfcounsel.com 6 7 ROBBINS LLP Stephen J. Oddo 8 5060 Shoreham Place, Suite 300 9 San Diego, California 92122 Tel: (619) 525-3990 10 Email: soddo@robbinsllp.com 11 c. Defendants’ Counsel: 12 13 COOLEY LLP Koji F. Fukumura 14 10265 Science Center Drive 15 San Diego, California 92121 Tel: (858) 550-6008 16 Email: kfukumura@cooley.com 17 18 13. Counsel for the Parties are directed to promptly inform each other of any 19 submission served on them (or that otherwise comes into their possession) pursuant to 20 paragraphs 9 through 11 of this Preliminary Approval Order. 21 14. Any Current Acadia Stockholder who fails to comply with the requirements 22 of this Preliminary Approval Order shall waive and forfeit any and all rights he, she or it 23 may otherwise have to object and/or to appear at the Settlement Hearing. Current Acadia 24 Stockholders do not need to appear at the hearing or take any other action to indicate their 25 approval of the proposed Settlement. 26 15. Any Current Acadia Stockholder who submits an objection to the proposed 27 Settlement shall be deemed to consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court with 28 1 respect to such objection and all issues that arise or relate to such objection, including any 2 order issued or findings made by the Court regarding the objection. 3 16. The Parties shall file with the Court (and serve on each other) any papers they 4 wish to submit in support of the proposed Settlement as follows: 5 a. Any motions for final approval of the proposed Settlement and motions for 6 Stockholders’ Counsel’s Fee and Expense Amount must be filed and served 7 at least twenty-eight (28) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing; and 8 b. Any papers in response to objections must be filed and served at least seven 9 (7) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing. 10 17. All proceedings in the Action are stayed until further order of the Court, 11 except as may be necessary to implement the Settlement or comply with the terms of the 12 Stipulation. 13 18. This Court may, for good cause, extend any of the deadlines set forth in this 14 Preliminary Approval Order without further notice to Current Acadia Stockholders. 15 19. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act or omission taken in 16 connection with the Stipulation or the Settlement, is intended or shall be deemed to be a 17 presumption, concession or admission by: (a) any of the Individual Defendants, Acadia or 18 any of the Released Defendant Parties as to the validity of any claims, causes of action or 19 other issues that were or could have been raised in the Action or in any other litigation, or 20 to be evidence of or constitute an admission of wrongdoing or liability by any of them; or 21 (b) Stockholders as to the lack of merit of any claim or the validity of any defense. 22 20. The Court reserves the right to hold the Settlement Hearing telephonically or 23 by videoconference without further notice to Current Acadia Stockholders. Any Current 24 Acadia Stockholder (or his, her or its counsel) who wishes to appear at the Settlement 25 Hearing should consult the Court’s calendar for any change in date, time or format of the 26 Settlement Hearing. The Court may approve the Settlement and any of its terms, with such 27 modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to 28 ! Current Acadia Stockholders. The Court retains jurisdiction to consider all further 2 applications arising out of or connected with the Settlement. 3 4 5 ||Dated: August 24, 2026 BE: eg Ze. A a 6 Hon, William Q. Hayes 7 United States District Court 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28