gno.law

District Court, S.D. California · 3:26-cv-01619 · 2026-05-07 · Unknown

Daniel Bravenec v. Hagerty Management, LLC

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Allison H. Goddard (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T20:31Z · confidence high

The court considered a joint motion by the plaintiff and defendant to continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) and Case Management Conference (CMC) from May 14, 2026, to July 17, 2026, due to the unavailability of defendant's counsel and representatives. The court granted the motion, finding good cause, and issued detailed procedural orders for the rescheduled conferences, including requirements for settlement authority, confidential statements, and videoconference logistics.

What the court decidedThe model
Joint Motion to Continue ENE and CMC granted
“The Court also appreciates that the parties have been working together, agrees that Defendant’s counsel’s and Defendant’s representative’s active participation is crucial, and finds good cause to GRANT the joint motion (ECF No. 10) as follows:”
agree with court
The court applied the 'good cause' standard required by local rules and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b). The parties provided a specific reason (counsel's pre-scheduled vacation) and proposed a mutually agreeable new date. The court's finding that good cause exists is consistent with the broad discretion afforded to district courts in scheduling matters and the non-rigorous nature of the good cause standard as cited in the order.

The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the applicable legal standard for continuing a scheduling conference (good cause) and cites appropriate Ninth Circuit authority to support the breadth of that standard. The court's factual findings regarding the parties' representations of unavailability support the conclusion that good cause exists. The subsequent procedural orders regarding settlement authority and conference logistics are standard and supported by the cited authorities.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DANIEL BRAVENEC, Case No.: 3:26-cv-01619-JO-AHG 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY 14 v. NEUTRAL EVALUATION 15 HAGERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 16 Defendant.

17 [ECF No. 10] 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral 19 Evaluation (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently set for 20 May 14, 2026. ECF No. 10. 21 Parties seeking to continue an ENE must demonstrate good cause. Chmb.R. at 2 22 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the 23 request”); ECF No. 8 at 6–7 (same); see FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must 24 be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”). Courts 25 have broad discretion in determining whether there is good cause. See, e.g., Johnson v. 26 Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992); Olvera v. Citibank, N.A., 27 No. 25-cv-789-H-AHG, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117769, at *2, *4–*5 (S.D. Cal. June 19, 28 2025). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across 1 procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 2 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to 3 amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson, 975 F.2d 4 at 609 (“[T]he focus of the inquiry is upon the moving party’s reasons for seeking 5 modification.... If that party was not diligent, the inquiry should end”). 6 Here, the parties represent to the Court that Defendant’s counsel is unavailable on 7 May 14, 2026, because he has a previously-scheduled vacation with his wife that cannot 8 be missed without significant hardship. ECF No. 10-1 at 2; ECF No. 10 at 2. Defendant’s 9 client representatives are likewise unavailable, though the reason for their unavailability is 10 not explained. ECF No. 10 at 2. As such, the parties request a continuance of the ENE and 11 CMC and suggest a date mutually available for all participants: July 17, 2026. Id. 12 The Court appreciates the parties’ thorough motion and their compliance with the 13 undersigned’s Chambers Rules. The Court also appreciates that the parties have been 14 working together, agrees that Defendant’s counsel’s and Defendant’s representative’s 15 active participation is crucial, and finds good cause to GRANT the joint motion (ECF 16 No. 10) as follows: 17 1. The ENE and CMC scheduled for May 14, 2026, are RESET for 18 July 17, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable Allison H. Goddard via videoconference. 19 2. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court requires attendance of all 20 named parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and 21 the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation via videoconference. CivLR 22 16.1(c)(1). 23 3. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal 24 discussion between the attorneys and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in 25 an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be 26 informal, off the record, and confidential. 27 4. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with 28 full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via 1 videoconference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully 2 explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to 3 the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 4 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the 5 settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. 6 Ariz. 2003). Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, 7 Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another person 8 who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement does not 9 have full authority. 10 5. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than July 10, 2026, the 11 parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the chambers 12 of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the defenses. 13 These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged 14 via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) 15 pages or less. There is not a page limit on exhibits. Each party’s ENE statement must 16 outline: 17 A. the nature of the case and the claims, 18 B. position on liability or defense, 19 C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific1 20 demand/offer for settlement,2 and 21 D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. 22 / / 23 24 1 A general statement, such as that a party “will negotiate in good faith,” is not a specific 25 demand or offer. 26 2 If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, 27 then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the 28 party must explain when they will be in a position to state a demand or offer. 1 The Court may use GenAI tools to review the information that the parties submit. Either 2 party may object to the Court’s use of such tools by advising the Court’s law clerk of that 3 objection when they submit the information. The Court will respect that objection without 4 any further explanation, and the Court’s law clerk will only communicate to Judge Goddard 5 that there was an objection, not which party made the objection. 6 6. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the 7 ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) 8 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Appearance of the parties at the CMC is not required. 9 The Court orders the following to occur before the CMC: 10 A. The parties represented to the Court that they met and conferred 11 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on April 8, 2026. See ECF No. 5 at 3. 12 B. The parties must file a Joint Case Management Statement by 13 July 2, 2026. The Joint Case Management Statement must address all 14 points in the “Joint Case Management Statement Requirements for 15 Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard,” which can be found on the court 16 website at: 17 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Join 18 t%20Case%20Management%20Statement%20Rules.pdf. The Court is 19 cognizant that the parties previously filed a Joint Discovery Plan (ECF 20 No. 5). However, due to the differences in substance, the parties’ Joint 21 Discovery Plan does not obviate the need for a Joint Case Management 22 Conference Statement here. Also, although the Court is unable to set 23 the ENE within the standard timeframe,3 the Court will consider 24 discovery to be open as of the date of this Order, and will take this 25 deadline into account when setting the case schedule during the CMC. 26 27 3 Local Rule 16.1(c) requires that an ENE take place within forty-five (45) days of the filing 28 1 C. Initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) must occur 2 May 6, 2026. See ECF No. 5 at 3 (prior agreement by the parties). 3 7. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All named parties, party 4 representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal 5 attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must attend the ENE via videoconference. All who 6 attend the ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. 7 Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement 8 authority) will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the 9 videoconference ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: 10 A. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold 11 the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on 12 computers through a download on the Zoom website 13 (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the 14 installation of a free app.4 Joining a Zoom conference does not require 15 creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file 16 (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants 17 are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize 18 themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.5 There is a cost-free 19 option for creating a Zoom account. 20 B. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will email each participant an 21 invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible, 22 participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the 23 24 25 4 If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video 26 conference, rather than mobile devices.

27 5 For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en- 28 us/categories/200101697-Getting-Started. 1 video conference, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. 2 Participants shall join the video conference by following the ZoomGov 3 Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have 4 Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the 5 ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and 6 install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants 7 to enter the password included in the invitation. 8 C. Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least 9 five minutes before the start of the ENE to ensure that the conference 10 begins promptly at 2:00 p.m. 11 D. Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the ENE as it 12 ordinarily would conduct an in-person one. The Court will divide 13 participants into separate, confidential sessions, which Zoom calls 14 Breakout Rooms.6 In a Breakout Room, the Court will be able to 15 communicate with participants from a single party in confidence. 16 Breakout Rooms will also allow parties and counsel to communicate 17 confidentially without the Court. 18 E. No later than July 10, 2026, counsel for each party shall send an e-mail 19 to the Court at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov containing the 20 following: 21 i. The name and title of each participant, including all parties 22 and party representatives with full settlement authority, claims 23 adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) 24 responsible for the litigation; 25 26 27 6 For more information on what to expect when participating in a Zoom Breakout Room, 28 visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/115005769646. 1 ii. An e-mail address for each participant to receive the Zoom 2 videoconference invitation; 3 iii. A telephone number where each participant may be reached; 4 and 5 iv. A cell phone number for that party’s preferred point of 6 contact (and the name of the individual whose cell phone it is) 7 for the Court to use during the ENE to alert counsel via text 8 message that the Court will soon return to that party’s Breakout 9 Room, to avoid any unexpected interruptions of confidential 10 discussions. 11 F. All participants shall display the same level of professionalism during 12 the ENE and be prepared to devote their full attention to the ENE as if 13 they were attending in person, i.e., cannot be driving or in a car while 14 speaking to the Court. Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery 15 of a participant’s device, each participant should ensure that their 16 device is plugged in or that a charging cable is readily available during 17 the videoconference. 18 G. Counsel are advised that although the ENE will take place on Zoom, all 19 participants shall appear and conduct themselves as if it is proceeding 20 in a courtroom, i.e., all participants must dress in appropriate courtroom 21 attire. 22 H. If the case does not settle during the ENE, the Court will hold the CMC 23 immediately following the ENE with counsel only in the main session. 24 8. New Parties Must be Notified by Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s Counsel: 25 Plaintiff’s counsel must give notice of the ENE to any Defendants who have been served 26 but who have not yet filed responsive pleadings as of the date of this Order. If any 27 Defendants have not yet been served, Plaintiff’s counsel must serve them with a copy of 28 this Order along with the summons and complaint. 1 9. The failure of any party to follow these mandatory procedures shall result 2 ||in the imposition of sanctions. 3 10. Questions regarding this case or these mandatory guidelines may be directed 4 ||to Judge Goddard’s law clerks at (619) 557-6162. Lodged statements should be emailed to 5 || efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 ||Dated: May 7, 2026 Morn H. Honorable Allison H. Goddard 9 United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28