Hilda Underwood; Troy Underwood v. Roadtrek, Inc.; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; Does 1 Through 10
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Allison H. Goddard (author)
Analysis
The court considered the parties' joint motion to continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) in a Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act case. The court granted the motion, reset the ENE for June 9, 2026, and issued detailed mandatory procedures for the parties to follow in preparation for the evaluation.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation granted“Good cause appearing, the joint motion is GRANTED.” | agree with court The order states that 'good cause appearing' is the basis for the decision. While the specific facts constituting good cause are not detailed in the text, granting a joint motion to continue a scheduling event is a standard exercise of a court's case management authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16. The decision is consistent with the law and the procedural posture of a joint request. |
Early Neutral Evaluation reset to June 9, 2026“Accordingly, the ENE is RESET to June 9, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. via videoconference before Magistrate [JUSTICE].” | agree with court This is a procedural scheduling order. The court has broad discretion to set and reset dates for conferences and evaluations. The new date is specific and provides adequate notice. |
Mandatory procedures for ENE preparation ordered“the Court issues the following Mandatory Procedures to be followed in preparation for the ENE” | agree with court The court is exercising its inherent authority and authority under Local Rules to manage the litigation and promote settlement. The requirements (statements, meet and confer, joint statement) are standard for Early Neutral Evaluations in this district and are designed to ensure the conference is productive. The requirement for full settlement authority is supported by the cited authorities. |
The order itself: sound — The order is a standard procedural order granting a joint motion and setting forth detailed, reasonable procedures for an Early Neutral Evaluation. It correctly cites relevant case law to support the requirement for full settlement authority. The procedures are specific, clear, and designed to promote the efficient resolution of the case, which is a proper exercise of the court's case management powers. There are no legal errors or significant gaps in the reasoning.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HILDA UNDERWOOD; TROY Case No.: 3:26-cv-02162-AGS-AHG UNDERWOOD, 12 ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiffs, MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY 13 NEUTRAL EVALUATION v. 14 ROADTREK, INC.; MERCEDES-BENZ [ECF No. 8] 15 USA, LLC; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral 19 Evaluation (“ENE”). ECF No. 8. Good cause appearing, the joint motion is GRANTED. 20 Accordingly, the ENE is RESET to June 9, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. via videoconference before 21 Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court 22 requires attendance of all parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for 23 insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation via 24 videoconference. CivLR 16.1(c)(1). 25 Based upon the Court’s familiarity with cases brought pursuant to the Song-Beverly 26 Consumer Warranty Act (the “Act”) relating to alleged defects in vehicles, and in the 27 interest of promoting the just, efficient, and economical determination of this action, the 28 1 Court issues the following Mandatory Procedures to be followed in preparation for the 2 ENE: 3 1. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal 4 discussion between the attorneys and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in 5 an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be 6 informal, off the record, and confidential. 7 2. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with 8 full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via 9 videoconference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully 10 explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to 11 the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 12 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the 13 settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. 14 Ariz. 2003). One of the purposes of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority 15 to attend the conference is that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the 16 conference. Id. at 486. Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s 17 Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another 18 person who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement 19 does not have full authority. 20 3. Required Statement by Plaintiffs: No later than April 28, 2026, Plaintiffs’ 21 counsel shall serve on opposing counsel a statement that sets forth the following 22 information: 23 a. the date and location of the vehicle purchase; 24 b. an itemized list of all claimed defects in the vehicle at issue, including 25 the date the defects were first discovered. Plaintiffs should attach any records in the 26 Plaintiffs’ possession, custody and control that reflect attempts to have the defects repaired; 27 c. the date and method (i.e., by phone, email, etc.) of any request by 28 Plaintiffs to Defendants to repurchase the vehicle; 1 d. the amount Plaintiffs demand for restitution related to the purchase 2 price of the vehicle, including Plaintiffs’ position as to the appropriate use offset; and 3 e. the amount Plaintiffs demand in civil penalties under the Act and the 4 grounds for seeking an award of civil penalties, including but not limited to documentation 5 sufficient to demonstrate that Plaintiffs complied with the pre-suit requirements set forth 6 in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 871.24 for seeking civil penalties. 7 4. Required Statement by Defendants: No later than May 19, 2026, 8 Defendants’ counsel shall serve on opposing counsel a statement that sets forth the 9 following information: 10 a. warranty information for the vehicle, including claims submitted to or 11 approved by Defendants concerning the vehicle; 12 b. service records for the vehicle, including service performed under a 13 warranty; 14 c. any records regarding a request by Plaintiffs to repurchase the vehicle 15 and Defendants’ response thereto; 16 d. any dispute regarding the amount Plaintiffs calculate to be due for 17 restitution, including the appropriate use offset; and 18 e. documentation of any response made by Defendants to any pre-suit 19 request for repurchase or replacement by Plaintiffs pursuant to California Code of Civil 20 Procedure Section 871.24. 21 5. Meet and Confer Requirement: After service of Plaintiffs’ statement and no 22 later than May 26, 2026, counsel for the parties, and any unrepresented parties, must meet 23 and confer in person or by videoconference to discuss settlement. Plaintiffs’ counsel is 24 responsible for making arrangements for the conference. The meet and confer obligation 25 cannot be satisfied by telephone or the exchange of letters. 26 6. Joint ENE Statement Required: No later than June 2, 2026, counsel for all 27 parties shall lodge with Magistrate Judge Goddard’s chambers a joint statement no longer 28 than two (2) pages, certifying that the required in-person or video conference between 1 counsel took place, and setting forth the results and the issues remaining to be discussed at 2 the ENE. The joint statement should attach the required statements by Plaintiffs and 3 Defendants described above, and any attachments thereto. This joint statement should be 4 lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. 5 7. Confidential ENE Statements Permitted: The parties may also submit a 6 confidential statement to the Court no later than June 2, 2026, of no more than five (5) 7 pages, directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard providing any additional 8 confidential information in advance of the ENE conference. These statements shall not 9 be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged via email at 10 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less. 11 There is not a page limit on exhibits. The Court may use GenAI tools to review the 12 information that the parties submit. Either party may object to the Court’s use of such tools 13 by advising the Court’s law clerk of that objection when they submit the information. The 14 Court will respect that objection without any further explanation, and the Court’s law clerk 15 will only communicate to Judge Goddard that there was an objection, not which party made 16 the objection. 17 8. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the 18 ENE, the Court will schedule a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) pursuant to Fed. 19 R. Civ. P 16(b). If either party believes it is necessary to engage in formal discovery prior 20 to the deadline for the Rule 26(f) conference, that party must meet and confer with the 21 opposing party and, if an agreement regarding formal discovery cannot be reached, the 22 parties must submit a joint email to efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov advising the Court 23 of the request for early discovery and setting forth three dates and times when the parties 24 are available for a conference with the Court on that issue. 25 9. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All persons who attend the 26 ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel 27 appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) 28 will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the videoconference 1 ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: 2 a. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold 3 the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on 4 computers through a download on the Zoom website 5 (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the 6 installation of a free app.1 Joining a Zoom conference does not require 7 creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file 8 (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants 9 are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize 10 themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.2 There is a cost-free 11 option for creating a Zoom account. 12 b. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will email each participant an 13 invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible, 14 participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the 15 video conference, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. 16 Participants shall join the video conference by following the ZoomGov 17 Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have 18 Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the 19 ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and 20 install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants 21 to enter the password included in the invitation. 22 c. Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least 23 24 25 1 If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, rather than mobile devices. 26 27 2 For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en- us/categories/200101697-Getting-Started 28 1 five minutes before the start of the ENE to ensure that the conference 2 begins promptly at 2:00 p.m. 3 d. Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the ENE as it 4 ordinarily would conduct an in-person one. The Court will divide 5 participants into separate, confidential sessions, which Zoom calls 6 Breakout Rooms.3 In a Breakout Room, the Court will be able to 7 communicate with participants from a single party in confidence. 8 Breakout Rooms will also allow parties and counsel to communicate 9 confidentially without the Court. 10 e. No later than June 2, 2026, counsel for each party shall send an e-mail 11 to the Court at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov containing the 12 following: 13 i. The name and title of each participant, including all parties 14 and party representatives with full settlement authority, claims 15 adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) 16 responsible for the litigation; 17 ii. An e-mail address for each participant to receive the Zoom 18 video conference invitation; 19 iii. A telephone number where each participant may be reached; 20 and 21 iv. A cell phone number for that party’s preferred point of 22 contact (and the name of the individual whose cell phone it is) 23 for the Court to use during the ENE to alert counsel via text 24 message that the Court will soon return to that party’s Breakout 25 Room, to avoid any unexpected interruptions of confidential 26 27 3 For more information on what to expect when participating in a Zoom Breakout Room, 28 I discussions. 2 f. All participants shall display the same level of professionalism during 3 the ENE and be prepared to devote their full attention to the ENE as if 4 they were attending in person, 1.e., cannot be driving or in a car while 5 speaking to the Court. Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery 6 of a participant’s device, each participant should ensure that their 7 device is plugged in or that a charging cable is readily available during 8 the video conference. 9 g. Counsel are advised that although the ENE will take place on Zoom, all 10 participants shall appear and conduct themselves as if it is proceeding 1] in a courtroom, 1.e., all participants must dress in appropriate courtroom 12 attire. 13 10. New Parties Must be Notified by Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ Counsel: 14 || Plaintiffs’ counsel must give notice of the ENE to any Defendants who have been served 15 ||but who have not yet filed responsive pleadings as of the date of this Order. If any 16 || Defendants have not yet been served, Plaintiffs’ counsel must serve them with a copy of 17 Order along with the summons and complaint. 18 11. The failure of any party to follow these mandatory procedures shall result 19 the imposition of sanctions. 20 12. Questions regarding this case or these mandatory guidelines may be directed 21 || to Judge Goddard’s law clerks at (619) 557-6162. Lodged statements should be emailed to 22 || efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: April 28, 2026 _ Siow. Xion Honorable Allison H. Goddard 26 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28