gno.law

District Court, S.D. California · 3:26-cv-00403 · 2026-03-24 · Unknown

Bianca Johnston, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Malcolm F. Marsh (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T20:36Z · confidence high

The court reviewed a joint motion by the parties to extend the briefing schedule to allow plaintiffs time to file a First Amended Complaint adding CLRA claims. The court denied the request for a specific briefing schedule and extended deadlines, instead setting a deadline for the First Amended Complaint based on Rule 15(a)(1)(B) and continuing the defendant's response deadline accordingly.

What the court decidedThe model
Request to hold Costco’s deadline to respond to the Complaint in abeyance is denied, but the deadline is continued to May 11, 2026.
“The parties’ request to: (1) Hold Costco’s deadline for responding to the Complaint in abeyance is DENIED. Costco’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is CONTINUED to May 11, 2026.”
agree with court
The court correctly applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A) and 15(a)(3), which provide that a party's time to respond to an amended pleading is calculated from the service of the amended pleading. By setting the deadline for the First Amended Complaint to April 20, 2026, the court logically extended the response deadline to May 11, 2026 (21 days later), rather than holding it in abeyance as requested.
Request to allow Plaintiffs to file a First Amended Complaint on or before April 30, 2026 is granted in part and denied in part, with the deadline set to April 20, 2026.
“The parties’ request to: (2) Allow Plaintiffs to file a first amended complaint on or before April 30, 2026, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs may file a first amended complaint on or before April 20, 2026.”
agree with court
The court relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), which allows a party to amend its pleading once as a matter of course no later than 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or motion. Since the defendant's response deadline was March 30, 2026, the 21-day period ended on April 20, 2026. The court correctly identified that the parties failed to provide good cause for an extension beyond this statutory deadline, citing local rules requiring detailed declarations for continuances.
Request to allow Costco to respond to the First Amended Complaint on or before June 4, 2026 is denied, with the deadline set to May 11, 2026.
“The parties’ request to: (3) Allow Costco to respond to the first amended complaint on or before June 4, 2026, is DENIED. Costco’s must respond to any filed first amended complaint on or before May 11, 2026.”
agree with court
This ruling is a direct consequence of the court's determination of the First Amended Complaint deadline. Under Rule 12(a)(1)(A), the time to respond to an amended pleading is 21 days after service. The court's calculation of May 11, 2026, is consistent with the April 20, 2026, deadline for the amendment.
Request to set a briefing schedule for the event that Costco responds by motion is denied.
“The parties’ request to: (4) Set a briefing schedule for the event that Costco responds to the first amended complaint by motion is DENIED.”
agree with court
The court stated it will set an appropriate briefing schedule after the motion is filed, citing local case management procedures. This is a standard procedural decision to avoid setting schedules for hypothetical future filings.

The order itself: sound — The order is procedurally sound. It correctly identifies the applicable rules for amendment and response deadlines. The court's refusal to grant the requested extension is supported by the parties' failure to provide the specific details and declarations required by local rules for continuances. The court's alternative scheduling is consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 BIANCA JOHNSTON, et al., Case No.: 26-cv-00403-AJB-AHG 14 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 15 v. DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION 16 COSTCO WHOLESALE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 12.1 CORPORATION, et al., 17 EXTENDING BRIEFING Defendants. SCHEDULE 18 19 (Doc. No. 4) 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is the Joint Motion and Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1 24 Extending Briefing Schedule filed by Plaintiffs Bianca Johnston and Anastasia Chernov 25 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”). (Doc. 26 No. 4.) The parties indicate that on January 26, 2026, Plaintiffs provided Costco “with the 27 notice contemplated by Cal. Civ. Code § 1782(a)” of claims for monetary relief under the 28 California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750 et seq. (“CLRA”). (Id. 1 at 2.) They additionally explain that “Plaintiffs intend to amend their Complaint to add 2 claims for monetary relief under the CLRA.” (Id.) The parties thus ask the Court to: 3 (1) Hold Costco’s deadline to respond to the Complaint in abeyance; 4 (2) Allow Plaintiffs to file a First Amended Complaint on or before April 30, 5 2026; 6 (3) Allow Costco to respond to the First Amended Complaint on or before 7 June 4, 2026; and 8 (4) Set a briefing schedule for the event that Costco responds to the First 9 Amended Complaint by motion. 10 (Id. at 3.) 11 The joint motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to 12 Chambers Rules, any requests to continue or reschedule a date or deadline must “include 13 specific details addressing . . . good cause for the requested change” and “be supported by 14 a detailed declaration, explaining the specific reasons.” J. Battaglia Civ. Case Proc. § III.D. 15 Despite this requirement, the parties do not offer any specific explanation for why Plaintiffs 16 require an additional month to prepare a first amended complaint. Pursuant to the CLRA, 17 a plaintiff must provide a defendant with 30 days of notice before “the commencement of 18 an action for damages.” Cal. Civ. Code § 1782(a). Thus, it appears that Plaintiffs could 19 have filed a first amended complaint as early as February 25, 2026, i.e., 30 days after 20 Plaintiffs’ January 26, 2026 notice to Costco. (Doc. No. 4 at 2.) It is unclear why Plaintiffs 21 seek an additional two months to amend their Complaint. (See generally id.) 22 Nevertheless, the Court recognizes Plaintiffs “may amend [their] pleading once as a 23 matter of course no later than . . . 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or . . . 24 motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 25 Courts also “freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 15(a)(2); see also Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Plaintiffs requested a waiver 27 of the service of summons on Costco on January 28, 2026. (Doc. No. 3.) Costco agreed to 28 the waiver. (Id.) Costco’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is thus March 30, 1 2026. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3), 6(a)(1)(C). Plaintiff would then be allowed to file a first 2 |jamended complaint by April 20, 2026. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Under these 3 || circumstances, Plaintiffs may file a first amended complaint on or before April 20, 2026. 4 Because the first amended complaint would moot any responsive filing by Costco, 5 || Costco’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is continued to May 11, 2026. Fed. R. Civ. 6 || P. 12(a)(1)(A), 15(a)(3). Costco may then respond to either the Complaint (if Plaintiffs fail 7 file a first amended complaint) or the anticipated first amended complaint. If Costco 8 ||responds by motion, the Court will set an appropriate briefing schedule after the motion is 9 || filed. See J. Battaglia Civ. Case Proc. § HI.B. 10 Accordingly, the parties’ request to: 11 (1) Hold Costco’s deadline for responding to the Complaint in abeyance is 12 DENIED. Costco’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is CONTINUED to 13 May 11, 2026. 14 (2) Allow Plaintiffs to file a first amended complaint on or before April 30, 2026, 15 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs may file a first 16 amended complaint on or before April 20, 2026. 17 (3) Allow Costco to respond to the first amended complaint on or before June 4, 18 2026, is DENIED. Costco’s must respond to any filed first amended complaint 19 on or before May 11, 2026. 20 (4) Set a briefing schedule for the event that Costco responds to the first amended 21 complaint by motion is DENIED. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 24, 2026 25 United States District Judge 26 27 28