Opinion

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} MARIO ALDANA SOSA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-3396-CAB-JLB 12 Petitioner.| ORDER DISMISSING AND 13 |] V. CLOSING CASE 14 || KRISTI NOEM, et al., 15 Respondents. Petitioner Mario Aldana Sosa filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. | (“Petition’”).] After Respondents acknowledged that 8 Petitioner was detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) pursuant to the final judgment in 19 Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-1873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3678485 (C.D. Cal. 20 Dec. 18, 2025), this Court ordered a bond hearing under § 1226(a) and its associated 2! regulations. [Doc. No. 19.] Petitioner subsequently received a bond hearing on January 12, 2026. [Doc. No. 20.] Petitioner has received the relief he requested and so the Court °3 DISMISSES the case. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. “a Itis SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: February 26, 2026 26 27 — Gb 38 Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo United States District Judge