Mayko Manuel AJ Sucuqui v. Christopher Larose
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cathy Ann Bencivengo (author)
Analysis
The court considered a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by an ICE detainee who claimed he was detained without an individualized bond hearing. The court ordered the respondent to provide the petitioner with an individualized bond hearing by March 9, 2026, and to report the outcome to the court by March 11, 2026.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Order requiring an individualized bond hearing“The Court thus ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its associated regulations by March 9, 2026.” | agree with court The respondent acknowledged in the return that the petitioner is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and is entitled to a bond hearing pursuant to the final judgment in Maldonado Bautista v. Noem. The court's order simply enforces this acknowledged entitlement and sets a specific timeline for compliance, which is a standard procedural mechanism in such cases. |
Order requiring update on bond hearing outcome“Respondents are further ORDERED to update this Court the outcome of Petitioner’s bond hearing by March 11, 2026.” | agree with court This is a standard administrative order to ensure the court retains jurisdiction and can verify compliance with the bond hearing mandate. |
The order itself: sound — The order is a straightforward enforcement of a prior judgment acknowledged by the respondent. It does not contain complex legal reasoning but correctly applies the statutory and case law basis provided in the return.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAYKO MANUEL AJ SUCUQUI, Case No.: 3:26-cv-0394-CAB-KSC 12 Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING A BOND 13 v. HEARING 14 CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Petitioner Maykol Manuel AJ Sucuqui. [Doc. No. 1 19 (“Petition”).] Petitioner claims that he has been detained by Immigration and Customs 20 Enforcement (“ICE”) since October 20, 2025 without the opportunity for an individualized 21 bond hearing. [Id. at 1–2.] 22 Respondent’s return to the Petition acknowledges that pursuant to the final judgment 23 in Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-1873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3678485 (C.D. 24 Cal. Dec. 18, 2025), “Petitioner is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and is entitled to an 25 order from this Court directing a bond hearing be held pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).” 26 [Doc. No. 4 at 2.] 27 /// 28 /// 1 The Court thus ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner an individualized bond 2 ||hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its associated 3 ||regulations by March 9, 2026. Respondents are further ORDERED to update this Court 4 the outcome of Petitioner’s bond hearing by March 11, 2026. 5 Itis SO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: February 23, 2026 (yge— 7 Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo g United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28