The People v. Ortega
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 8/26/13
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E054882 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF105398)
ENRIQUE ORTEGA, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 21, 2013, be modified as follows. The third full sentence on page 16 is modified to add the word “not” before the word “allege” so the sentence reads as follows:
The court held that the amended pleadings did not allege the “same conduct” as the original pleading and therefore did not relate back. Except for this modification, the opinion remains unchanged. This modification does not effect a change in judgment.
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
RICHLI J. We concur:
HOLLENHORST Acting P. J.
McKINSTER J.