Ryerson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Robert Steven Huie (author)
Analysis
The court considered a joint motion to dismiss filed by the parties in a civil action. The court granted the motion and dismissed the case with prejudice, ordering each party to bear its own costs.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Joint Motion to Dismiss granted“The action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.” | agree with court The order states that the motion satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which allows for dismissal upon the written consent of all parties. The court cites Wilson v. City of San Jose for the proposition that such a dismissal is effective upon filing. The decision follows directly from the rule and the cited authority. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the procedural basis for the dismissal (Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) and cites binding Ninth Circuit authority regarding the effective date of such a dismissal. The reasoning is sufficient for a procedural dismissal by consent.
Opinion
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || TINA RYERSON, Case No.: 24-cv-489-RSH-MSB 1 Plaintit | ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH 13 || v. PREJUDICE 14 |} ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 19. The Motion 20 || satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and is effective on filing. See Wilson v. 21 || City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is hereby 22 || DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each Party is to bear its own fees and costs. The 23 || Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: April 7, 2025 fehut □□□ Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge 27 28