Justino Rupard v. County of San Diego

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23CV1357-CAB (BLM) 11 JUSTINO RUPARD; RONNIE RUPARD, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION FOR PARTIAL STAY AND SETTING 13 v. BRIEFING SCHEDULE 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF No. 181] 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently before this Court is the Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Stay the Court’s Order 18 granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel that was issued on February 5, 2025. ECF Nos. 176, 181. 19 Defendants are not seeking a stay of the Court’s Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) that was also 20 issued in the February 5, 2025 Order. ECF No. 181 at 2. Counsel for Defendants represents 21 that all parties have “stipulated to the requested relief and will not be opposing the ex parte 22 motion.” Ainslie Decl. at ¶ 8, ECF No. 181-1. 23 In the Court’s February 5, 2025 Order, this Court granted the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel 24 on the ground that the Critical Incident Review Board (“CIRB”) documents were not protected 25 by attorney-client privilege. See ECF No. 176. On February 10, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued 26 its opinion in Greer v. County of San Diego and found that the CIRB documents at issue in that 27 matter were protected by attorney-client privilege. See id. – F.4th --, 2025 WL 441836 (9th Cir. 1 resubmit the documents for in camera review by February 14, 2025 and STAYS the Order 2 requiring Defendants to produce these documents to Plaintiffs after redactions were made. The 3 ||Order requiring Defendants to submit declarations regarding the deficient pleadings and 4 || requiring Defendants to personally appear at the OSC to address why monetary sanctions should 5 be imposed is not stayed. 6 In their motion, Defendants have informed the Court that they intend to file a motion to 7 || reconsider the Court’s February 5, 2025 Order. Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing 8 || schedule: 9 1. Defendants must file their motion for reconsideration on or before February 21, 10 2025. 11 2. Plaintiffs may file any opposition to this motion on or before February 28, 2024. 12 No replies will be accepted. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the 13 matters under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and no personal appearances 14 || will be required. 15 16 ||Dated: 2/14/2025 lobe Mager 17 Hon. Barbara L. Major United States Maqistrate Judde 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28